>>924743
maybe if we build AI with visual cortex the size of the human one
if I'm not mistaken, AI is already better than human at the image classification task, so building a super-smart bridge detector shouldn't be a problem
the problem is to how apply it also for a lot of similar tasks (find me a lake similar to this one, a house similar to this one, a place of interest similar to this one), and also to check if it corresponds to the original photo. our brain easily does that, but building AI for the general case might be hard
well, at the very least you can just tell it something like "find me all bridges in that area from the google map" (it will crawl all the places) and then you will check them one by one by hand. already much easier than scrolling the map by yourself (like that guy does)